Translate this page into:
Notice: Please configure GTranslate from WP-Admin -> Settings -> GTranslate to see it in action.
Surgical treatment of spinal arachnoid web: Report of two cases and literature review
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Rodrigues AB, Rodrigues DB, Queiroz JW, Laube KA, Braga MC, Kita WS, et al. Surgical treatment of spinal arachnoid web: Report of two cases and literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:316.
Abstract
Background:
Arachnoid webs (AWs) can cause cord compression and syringomyelia in the thoracic spine. Here, we describe two patients who underwent operative treatment for AW and reviewed the literature.
Case Description:
Two patients underwent surgical treatment for thoracic AW. Both presented with spastic gait and numbness in the lower extremities. On MR, these lesions exhibited the “scalpel” sign (i.e. due to the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid on the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord). Operative intervention, consisting of fenestration and web resection, resulted in symptom resolution.
Conclusion:
Thoracic AWs are rare lesions that should be considered among the differential diagnosis of spinal compressive syndromes. Surgical fenestration and resection of the AW correct the flow dynamics allowing for full symptoms resolution.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
“Spinal arachnoid web (AW)” is defined by a thickening of the arachnoid membrane occurring along the spinal cord under the pial surface. It is believed to originate from a malformed or ruptured arachnoid cyst. These AWs are rare and can cause compressive myelopathy particularly in the thoracic spine.[1,4]
On magnetic resonance (MR) T2-weighted sagittal sequences, these lesions produce the “scalpel sign,” due to AW’s resultant accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the dorsal aspect of the spinal cord.[5-7] These are typically surgical lesions requiring both fenestration and resection, following which symptoms/signs typically resolve.[7]
CASE REPORT
Case 1
History and examination
A 36-year-old male presented with a progressive weakness of the left leg greater than the right leg (range of 4− to 4+/5), hyperactive lower extremity reflexes/Babinski responses, a bilateral L1 relatively sensory level, and sphincter dysfunction of 4 month’s duration.
Imaging studies
The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine showed the spinal cord compression at the T7 level (enlargement of the spinal cord is the positive “scalpel sign:” focal dorsal indentation secondary to deformity of the cord at the level, because of the resemblance on sagittal MRI images to a scalpel with its blade pointing posteriorly) and inferior syringomyelia [Figure 1].
These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of an AW or anterior spinal cord herniation.
Surgical report
The patient underwent a T6–T7 laminotomy. A midline durotomy was then performed. After the opening the arachnoid, exposing the dorsal cord, there were multiple septate membranes between the dura and the spinal cord that thick fibrotic tissue appeared to strange the cord (i.e. adhesions to the ventral dura, contributed to cord compression) [Figure 2]. At surgery, following careful microdissection of these adhesions from medullary pia mater resulted in decompression and immediate cord reexpansion.
Follow-up
There were no postoperative complications, and the patient was discharged days later. The 3 months postoperative MR showed resolution of spinal compression and but residual syringomyelia [Figure 3]. His examination 4 months later had largely normalized [Table 1].
Case 2
History and examination
A 49-year-old female also presented with paraparesis/ myelopathy but intact sphincter function. The thoracic MRI of again showed the spinal cord displaced at the T7 level, with a central syrinx [Figure 4]. She too underwent a T6– T7 that showed a thickened AW consistent with an AW, and microdissection released the adhesions resulting in spinal cord reexpansion [Figure 5]. The postoperative MR 1 month later was normal, and the patient at 4 postoperative months regained normal function [Figure 6] [Table 1].
DISCUSSION
Definition and etiology
AWs are rare pathology. They are defined as intradural transverse extramedullary bands of arachnoid tissue connecting the dorsal surface of the spinal cord to the dura. A total of 43 cases have been documented.[1,4,6] Almost all cases were reported dorsally, including both of our cases. Inflammation following trauma, prior surgery, hemorrhage, and spinal infection might have caused the AW in some studies.[4]
Epidemiology
The majority of patients present with thoracic AW; they are typically male, middle aged, and present with paraparesis/ myelopathy.[6] A syrinx occurs in 85% of cases.[4]
Diagnosis
MRI is the most accurate test for diagnosing AW.[2,3,6] The T2-weighted sagittal sequence demonstrates the pathognomonic finding of the “Scalpel sign,” formed by the accumulation of CSF on the dorsal spinal cord, but with preservation of the ventral subarachnoid space.[2,4,5] CT myelography may demonstrate indirect AW signs, such as obstruction to CSF flow, although complete obstruction is not common.[7]
Treatment and outcome
Surgical treatment should include fenestration and resection of the web.[2,4,7] Most commonly this involves laminectomy with intradural excision of the AW. Nisson et al.[4] recommended surgical lysis/excision. The various surgical techniques include; laminectomy (or hemilaminectomy) at the level of the lesion with the excision of the AW (86%), placement of a shunt or stent (17%), or bypassing the CSF at the level of AW obstruction.[1,3,4] Postoperatively, 91% of patients with AW improve neurologically.[4,6]
CONCLUSION
AWs are rare typically thoracic lesions responsible for a compressive myelopathy that is readily relieved with operative decompression.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- Dorsal spinal arachnoid web diagnosed with the 12 quantitative measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow on magnetic resonance 13 imaging. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:227-33.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for arachnoid web: A case series. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019;3:43-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Thoracic spinal cord impingement by an arachnoid web at the level of a hemivertebra: Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27:638-42.
- [Google Scholar]
- Arachnoid web of the spine: A systematic literature review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31:175-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Dorsal thoracic arachnoid web and the “scalpel sign”: A distinct clinical-radiologic. Am J Neurorradiol. 2013;34:1104-10.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical and radiologic outcomes after fenestration and partial wall excision of idiopathic intradural spinal arachnoid cysts presenting with myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:213-22.
- [Google Scholar]
- Spinal intradural arachnoid webs causing spinal cord compression with inconclusive preoperative imaging: A report of 3 cases and a review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:251-8.
- [Google Scholar]
Fulltext Views
6
PDF downloads
0
