Translate this page into:
Notice: Please configure GTranslate from WP-Admin -> Settings -> GTranslate to see it in action.
Giant arachnoid cyst in adult presented with secondary epileptiform activity
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Stanishevskiy A, Gizatullin S, Davydov D. Giant arachnoid cyst in adult presented with secondary epileptiform activity. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:418.
Abstract
Background:
Current studies contain controversies regarding indications and preferable surgical techniques for arachnoid cysts.
Case Description:
In this paper we present case report of giant arachnoid cyst of right frontal lobe in young left-handed adult with headache, MRI sings of brain compression and epileptiform activity on EEG, treated by microsurgical cystostomy.
Conclusion:
We add a case of young adult with tension headaches and possible sub-clinical seizures due to arachnoid cyst, whose symptoms disappeared after surgical management of the cyst, including normalization of EEG.
Keywords
Adult
Arachnoid cyst
Cystostomy
Epilepsy
frontal lobe
INTRODUCTION
Arachnoid cysts (ACs) are common benign congenital intracranial lesions, most of them are an accidental finding.[1] Pathogenesis of cysts formation is not clear and presumably associated with splitting of arachnoid layer during embryogenesis. Rare localization of supratentorial ACs is interhemispheric fissure. Usual clinical appearances of such ACs are headache, seizures, and focal deficit. There is no generally accepted approach to surgical treatment of ACs. We discuss a case of giant AC with sings of brain compression and epileptiform activity on electroencephalography (EEG) without seizures.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A Left handed adult patient with head deformity and everyday intensive headaches in the right temporal region, worsening with straining, presented in our neurosurgical department. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans showed giant arachnoid cyst of the right hemisphere [Figure 1].

No cognitive impairment was found: Mini Mental State Examination scale 30/30, Frontal Assessment Battery 18/18, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale 30/30, Trial Making Test (TMT) A 27 s, TMT B 69 s, and Hamilton depression rating scale 5. Neurological examination showed no focal deficit. Ophthalmological examination reviled no signs of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). EEG detected epileptiform activity from the right frontal lobe [Figures 2a and b]. Computed tomography (CT) cisternography confirmed that cyst was isolated from subarachnoid space [Figures 2c and d]. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure during lumbar puncture was 18 cm.

Taking into account headaches, abnormal EEG, MRI signs of brain compression, and isolated type of cyst, we performed microsurgical cystostomy [Figure 3].

Based on light microscopic findings, a histologic diagnosis of AC was made [Figure 4a and b].

Postoperative course was fine, headaches disappeared, EEG showed resolution of epileptiform activity [Figure 4c and d]. The patient was symptom free at 12 months follow-up and EEG showed no signs of previously seen epileptiform activity.
DISCUSSION
The common prevalence of ACs in adults is estimated at 1.4% and slightly higher in men then in women.[1] The most cases are clinically silent. Sometimes, natural history of ACs includes spontaneous or traumatic rupture,[6] cysts enlargement with brain compression, and hydrocephalus, increasing focal deficit. ACs could be presented with parkinsonism,[7] cognitive impairment,[3] anxiety, and depression,[4] however, described case had no such presentation. Even large and giant ACs could be asymptomatic.[5]
Four main theories of cyst’s enlargement are as follows: (1) CSF secretion by inner surface of the cyst, (2) osmotic gradient between the cystic content and the CSF, (3) slit-valve mechanism between cyst and the subarachnoid space, and (4) pulsation of intracystic fluid of venous or arterial origin.[10] We did not find any valve-like structures during intraoperative examination.
Presented case characterized by unspecific symptoms, so treatment has been controversial. Despite the benefits from surgery of symptomatic arachnoid cysts, some authors proposed that seizures and headaches often persist after treatment.[2] Wang et al. supported the view that patients with unspecific symptoms may profit from surgical cyst decompression.[9] At the same time, Rabiei et al. found no changes in surgically treated patients despite self-reported improvement.[8] Some authors recommend medical treatment for patients with headache or seizures.[9] The current case had been suspected symptomatic despite absence of raised ICP. Indications for surgery were signs of brain compression, epileptiform activity, and isolated cyst during CT cisternography.
Surgical modalities available for ACs are as follows: microsurgical resection of cyst’s wall with or without connection with ventricles or basal cisterns; endoscopic fenestration; and cyst-peritoneal shunting. Several studies propose independence of clinical outcome from surgical modality.[9] We prefer to avoid cyst shunting due to the patient’s young age and not to cause shunt dependence.
Yamasaki et al. noted that epileptic seizures may remain unchanged or worsen after surgery on interhemispheric ACs.[10] Apparently, we present rare observation of normalization of EEG after cyst’s fenestration.
CONCLUSION
ACs are rare reasons of headaches and seizures in adults. Surgery could be preferable treatment option despite minimal clinical presentation. Indications for surgery are as follows: increased ICP, evidences of cyst’s enlargement, hydrocephalus, signs of brain compression, and epileptiform activity. CT cisternography is useful for establishing indications for surgery while isolated cyst confirmed.
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- J Neurosurg. 2013;118:222-31.Prevalence and natural history of arachnoid cysts in adults.
- [Google Scholar]
- N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2265.Large arachnoid cyst.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:1342-57.A case of an arachnoid cyst masquerading as corticobasal degeneration.
- [Google Scholar]
- World Neurosurg. 2019;132:645-53.Anxiety and depression in patients with intracranial arachnoid cysts-a prospective study.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:982-3.Asymptomatic giant arachnoid cyst.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acta Med Port. 2014;27:137-41.Arachnoid cyst spontaneous rupture.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acta Neurol Belg. 2017;117:347-9.Parkinsonism and cognitive impairment due to a giant frontal arachnoid cyst and improving after shunting.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg. 2018;128:250-7.Does subjective improvement in adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts justify surgical treatment?
- [Google Scholar]
- J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1456-61.Clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment for symptomatic arachnoid cysts in adults.
- [Google Scholar]
- Surg Neurol. 2003;59:68-74.Interhemispheric arachnoid cyst in the elderly: Case report and review of the literature.
- [Google Scholar]