Original Article
2021
:12;
192
doi:
10.25259/SNI_850_2020

Effects of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine maintenance infusion in posterior spinal fusion surgery on acute postoperative pain

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Corresponding author: Mahzad Alimian, Pain Research Center, Anesthesiology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran alimian.m@iums.ac.ir
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Nikoubakht N, Alimian M, Faiz SHR, Derakhshan P, Sadri MS. Effects of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine maintenance infusion in posterior spinal fusion surgery on acute postoperative pain. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:192.

Background:

One of the most challenging issues after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery is providing appropriate pain control measures to enhance recovery of the patients. We aimed to compare effects of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion during maintenance of anesthesia on acute postoperative pain in PSF surgery.

Methods:

In a double-blinded randomized clinical trial, 87 patients candidates for PSF surgery were randomly assigned into three groups. Anesthesia protocol for all groups was the same except: the first group received 0.2 mcg/kg/h dexmedetomidine infusion, the second received 0.1 mg/kg/h ketamine infusion, and control group received normal saline infusion as a placebo. Pain intensity by VAS scale and level of sedation by Ramsey scale were assessed, and amount of opioid prescribed after surgery was measured and compared for patients during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery in three groups, and hypotension and bradycardia during operation were reported.

Results:

There was a significant difference among the groups regarding pain intensity and amount of opioids during recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Pain intensity and amount of opioids for ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups were significantly lower than those in the controls during recovery and at the hours after surgery. There was no significant difference regarding bradycardia and hypotension and level of sedation during recovery and at the hours after surgery.

Conclusion:

Both ketamine and dexmedetomidine infusions during maintenance of anesthesia are effective in reducing acute postoperative pain effectively after PSF surgery.

Keywords

Acute postoperative pain
Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride
Ketamine hydrochloride
Posterior spinal fusion surgery

INTRODUCTION

One of the most challenging issues after surgery is providing appropriate pain control measures to enhance recovery of the patients.

Patients’ pain comes with unwanted side effects and complications. Meanwhile, the acute postoperative pain is considered as an annoying problem for patients after surgery and the severe pain can cause unfavorable hemodynamic and metabolic responses. About 21% of patients experience moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.[5,13] Inadequate postoperative pain management can result in such complications as long recovery and hospitalization, increased hospital costs, and decreased patient satisfaction.[12] The effective postoperative pain management is currently a part of the surgical process and not only reduces a patient’s suffering but also decreases mortality, promotes rapid hospital discharge, improves a patient’s quality of life, and reduces hospital costs. The effective postoperative pain management entails a multimodal approach involving several drugs with different mechanisms of action.[6] There are many different treatment options for reducing the postoperative pain, and each has its own benefits,[16] including the administration of opioids before or during surgery. Medications such as dexmedetomidine and ketamine can be used during surgery to relief pain. Ketamine as a NMDA and HCN1 receptor blocker causes analgesic and hypnotic effects. The analgesic effects of the ketamine can be combined with the antinociceptive effects of the opioids. Dexmedetomidine can cause analgesic effects through effects on alpha 2 receptors in the central nervous system and inhibitory effects on the posterior spinal cord. The fusion technique is commonly used to prevent further degeneration of the lumbar spine and trauma to the cord and stabilization of spine and reducing pain. In this operation, a bone bridge is formed between the outer surfaces of lumbar spine in the painful area to relieve the pain by immobilizing the disc. There are several different techniques to perform this surgery and each has its own benefits and risks. Surgical techniques include an anterior/posterior fusion or both sides of the disc.[7,17] Given that, the posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is the most common type of fusion surgery, and therefore, postoperative pain management and the use of anesthetic techniques associated with better postoperative pain control are emphasized.

Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion during surgery on the acute postoperative pain in PSF surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of patients candidate for PSF surgery who hospitalized in the hospital with which the authors are affiliated, in Tehran, Iran, during 2019– 2020. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted on 87 patients undergoing PSF surgery. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: IR.IUMS. FMD.REC.1397.213) and registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with ID: IRCT20180723040570N2. The sample size was estimated using the following formula. The sample size was 29 subjects per group. In the following relation, the values of Type I error (α) and Type II error (β) are estimated 5% and 2%, respectively. Furthermore, the values of standard deviations (SD) S1 and S2 are equal to 27.8 and 22, respectively, and the effect size (d) is 18.6 based on the values obtained for Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale in the study of Colette et al. (2011).[3]

$n=\frac{\left({S}_{1}^{2}+{S}_{2}^{2}\right){\left({z}_{1-\alpha }{2}}+{z}_{1-\beta }\right)}^{2}}{{\left(d\right)}^{2}}$

After acquisition of informed consent and eligibility of patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, they were included in the study. The exclusion criteria included: PSF surgery due to traumatic fracture; those with a history of chronic mental disorder on medication; a history of systemic diseases such as heart failure and liver, renal, lung, and infectious diseases; history of hypertension (blood pressure higher than 140/90 mm Hg); and a history of diabetes (a fasting blood sugar level higher than 120 mg/dL) and history of addiction. Furthermore, patients with a history of seizure disorders and increased intracranial pressure, as well as patients with arrhythmia or heart rhythm disorders or AV block were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients undergoing PSF surgery who hospitalized in Rasoul Akram Hospital in Tehran, Iran, during 2019–2020, were included in the study.

As shown in [Table 1], there was no significant difference among the groups with respect to age and sex (P > 0.05).

Based on the results of ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test, there was no significant difference among the groups in terms of level of sedation during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05).The repeated measures ANOVA results showed that intragroup measurement of level of sedation was significantly decreased in the three groups during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05) [Table 2].

There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of level of sedation during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P > 0.05).

The results of ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed between the ketamine and control groups with respect to the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significant difference between dexmedetomidine and control groups in terms of the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The repeated measures ANOVA results indicated that there was a significant difference among the intragroups with respect to the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05) [Table 3]. There was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05).

As shown in [Table 4], there was no significant difference among the groups with respect to hypotension and bradycardia during surgery (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05).

As shown in [Table 5], there was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the amount of opioids prescribed during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups in terms of the amount of opioids prescribed (P > 0.05). Furthermore, a significant difference was found between ketamine and control groups with respect to the amount of opioids prescribed (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant difference between dexmedetomidine and control groups with respect to the amount of opioids prescribed (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the amount of opioids prescribed during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study demonstrate that there was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the pain intensity during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups with respect to the pain intensity. Furthermore, there was a significant difference among the groups with respect to the amount and number of opioids prescribed during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Moreover, there was no significant difference among the groups in terms of level of sedation during the recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery.[6] There are many different treatment options for reducing the postoperative pain, and each has its own benefits,[16] including the administration of opioids before or during surgery. In one study, Suzuki et al. reported that dextromethorphan combined with ketamine can significantly reduce pain intensity and need for narcotic drugs in the postoperative phase,[14] which are consistent with our findings. However, in our study, combination therapy was not used in the groups. In the study of Aziz et al., it has been showed that the dexmedetomidine group exhibited more benefits in sedation and pain levels, additional sedative/ analgesic requirements, and extubation time. No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the outcome measures, except heart rate, which was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group. [1] Moreover, in the study of Reichert et al., no statistically significant differences were found between the propofol and dexmedetomidine groups when assessing the outcomes of opioid requirements and the time to extubation,[11] which are consistent with our results. Furthermore, the results of the study of Anger et al. demonstrated that dexmedetomidine therapy led to a higher incidence of hypotension and analgesic consumption compared to propofol-based sedation therapy,[2] which are not consistent with our results. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the drug compared with dexmedetomidine and the study populations. The results of the study of Gharaei et al. showed that preemptive low-dose ketamine as a bolus has opioid-sparing effects in opioid abusers undergoing moderate sedation,[4] which are not consistent with our results. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the study design and the study populations. In line with the results of the present study, Ranadhir et al. reported that in patients undergoing lumbar instrumentation surgery, opioid consumption, VAS scores, PCA pump demands, inhalational agent consumption, and hospital stay were comparable when either ketamine or dexmedetomidine was used as intraoperative anesthetic adjuvants.[8] In the study of Parikh et al., it has been demonstrated that small dose of ketamine reduced postoperative pain, decreased morphine consumption, and delayed patients request for analgesia beyond the clinical duration of action of ketamine after open renal surgery,[9] which are in line with our findings. The results of the study of Tufanogullari et al. showed that dexmedetomidine infusion perioperatively is safe and can minimize narcotic requirements and reduce duration of stay after laparoscopic bariatric procedures,[15] which are consistent with our results.

The result of the study of Rahimzadeh et al. showed that dexmedetomidine had a significant lowering impact on intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate compared to remifentanil (P < 0.001). The mean of postextubation and recovery pain score in patients taking remifentanil was significantly higher than patients taking dexmedetomidine (P < 0.05).[10]

CONCLUSION

Both ketamine and dexmedetomidine are effective in reducing the acute pain after PSF surgery. The lack of significant difference between the ketamine and dexmedetomidine may be due to a low dose of the dexmedetomidine. Therefore, it is recommended to examine the different doses of dexmedetomidine or combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in the future studies.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), Iran University of Medical Science for its editorial assist.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. , , , , , , . Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus morphine in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33:150-4.
2. , , , , . Evaluation of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-based sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients at a tertiary academic medical center. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010;9:221-6.
3. , , , , , , . Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:123-30.
4. , , , , , , . Opioid-sparing effect of preemptive bolus low-dose ketamine for moderate sedation in opioid abusers undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:75-80.
5. , , , , , , . The prevalence of postoperative pain in a cross-sectional group of patients after day-case surgery in a university hospital. Clin J Pain. 2007;23:543-8.
6. , , . Pain management strategies in hand surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46:399-408.:11-408.
7. , , , , , , . Dextromethorphan analgesia in a human experimental model of hyperalgesia. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:356-68.
8. , , , , . Comparison of small dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine infusion for postoperative analgesia in spine surgery--a prospective randomized double-blind placebo controlled study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;28:27-31.
9. , , . Preventive analgesia: Effect of small dose of ketamine on morphine requirement after renal surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27:485-8.
10. , , , . Remifentanil versus dexmedtomidine for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29:215.
11. , , , , , . Effect of a dexmedetomidine substitution during a nationwide propofol shortage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:673-7.
12. , , , , , . Assessment of quality in day-case hand surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009;28:735-42.
13. , . Optimising postoperative pain management in the ambulatory patient. Drugs. 2003;63:855-67.
14. . Role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in postoperative pain management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:618-22.
15. , , , , , , . Dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: The effect on recovery outcome variables. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1741-8.
16. , , . Recent advances in postoperative pain management. Yale J Biol Med. 2010;83:11-25.