View/Download PDF
Case Report
2021
:12;
205
doi:
10.25259/SNI_245_2021
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Dural leakage due to ipsilateral needle placement for spinal level localization in unilateral decompression surgery: A case report

Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, Aarau,
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter and Regenerative Neuroscience Cluster, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern,
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrassse, Switzerland.
Corresponding author: Lukas Andereggen, Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001 Aarau, Switzerland. lukas.andereggen@ksa.ch
Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Andereggen L, Luedi MM. Dural leakage due to ipsilateral needle placement for spinal level localization in unilateral decompression surgery: A case report. Surg Neurol Int 2021;12:205.

Abstract

Background:

A spinal dural defect caused by needle placement for spinal level localization is an uncommon complication of cerebrospinal fluid leak with the potential for the development of intracranial hypertension.

Case Description:

Our 48-year-old patient underwent unilateral fenestration and sequestrectomy for intractable L5 radiculopathy due to disc herniation at the level L4–5 on the right side. The spinal level was identified with fluoroscopy after placement of a 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle on the right side. Intraoperatively, a sub-millimeter spinal dural defect was visualized on the ipsilateral side.

Conclusion:

Caution is needed when needle placement is used to localize the spinal level for unilateral surgery.

Keywords

Dural puncture
Intracranial hypotension
Lumbar spinal surgery
Postdural puncture headache
Sealing

INTRODUCTION

State-of-the-art lumbar microdiscectomy is superior with respect to pain intensity when compared to conservative treatment in patients with refractory long-lasting sciatica.[1,15] To ensure a good outcome, correct localization of the spinal level before incision is of utmost importance.[14] A wide variety of options exist, but there is little consensus regarding which is most effective.[13] Frequently, the spinal level is affirmed through a needle inserted and visualized under direct fluoroscopy.[7,13] Rarely, when the needle is inserted too deeply, it can perforate the dural sac, causing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Even a sub-millimeter dural defect can be sufficient to cause the development of intracranial hypotension (IH), with potentially life-threatening sequelae.[2,3] Thus, measures to prevent inadvertent durotomies are crucial. Here, we emphasize their importance by illustrating the clinical course of a 48-year-old man undergoing microdiscectomy, in whom intraoperative dural leakage resulted from a 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle being placed too deeply on the ipsilateral side of the spinal decompression. We discuss the importance of contralateral needle placement in unilateral spinal surgery, along with state-of-the-art intraoperative anesthesiological and surgical measures in the prevention of CSF leakage and potential IH development.

The patient provided written informed consent for this case report.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old otherwise healthy trucker (BMI 26.3 kg/m2) presented with intractable L5 radiculopathy on the right side refractory to conservative therapies. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging revealed a right-sided cranially migrated lumbar intervertebral disc herniation at the level L4–L5, compressing the L5 nerve root [Figure 1a]. After being informed of his options, the patient gave consent to proceed with microdiscectomy. Under general anesthesia, the patient was positioned prone, with the spine flexed to optimally open the interlaminar space. The L4–5 interspace was localized using a 24-gauge (length 90 mm) Sprotte tip needle inserted on the right side [Figure 1b].

Figure 1:: The site of dural puncture by a spinal needle placed in the wrong location during level identification. (a) T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showing cranially migrated disc herniation at the level L4–L5. (b) Location of the spinal needle at the level L4–L5, with a relatively deep position between the spinal process. (c) Intraoperative images reveal the single interrupted stitch at the dura (arrow), with depiction of the L5 nerve and underlying disc herniation.

Following right-sided microsurgical fenestration and flavectomy, a dural puncture was identified adjacent to the outgoing L5 nerve root on the right side. The sub-millimeter defect was sealed with a simple interrupted 5–0 monofilament suture. Subsequently, a sequestrectomy was performed [Figure 1c], completely releasing the dural sac and spinal nerve. Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) did not reveal any spinal fluid leakage at the site of durotomy. The postoperative course and wound healing were uneventful, with no recurrent disc herniation, sciatica, or orthostatic headache at 1-year follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Sub-millimeter spinal dural defects can be sufficient to induce IH, with potentially life-threatening sequelae.[2,3] Although incorrect placement of a spinal needle for identification of the proper level is an extremely uncommon cause of dural leakage, it has been described following spinal anesthesia (SA), with postdural puncture headache affecting as many as 35% of patients.[9,19] To prevent CSF leakage in spinal surgeries using SA, the latter is generally performed rostral to the level of surgery. Presumably, bony removal for fenestration or hemilaminectomy, along with removal of (hypertrophied) ligamentum flavum, decreases the tamponade effect on the dura, thus increasing the risk of ongoing CSF leakage postoperatively.[11,18] In this setting, a simple measure such as needle placement on the contralateral side may minimize the risk of IH development in the case of unilateral decompression. Nonetheless, when a dural puncture is discovered, proper sealing is of utmost importance, in particular when the tamponade effect is missing. Unlike in spontaneous CSF leakage, a postoperative epidural blood patch is often not efficient.[6] There is no consensus as to treatment options in the case of persistent IH symptoms for patients undergoing microdiscectomy,[5] and procedures for dural repair vary considerably.[10]

Primary closure by dural suturing can be technically difficult in minimally invasive spinal surgeries.[17] Although in the case of a narrow surgical field the surgeon might be tempted to use a fat or muscle graft, their sealing effect is often marginal.[4] Similarly, the use of fibrin glue for dural repair did not significantly decrease the incidence of a persistent CSF leak in one study.[8] Although the dural defect was minimal in the case we present here, a simple interrupted 5–0 monofilament suture was used for watertight primary closure, as this method tends to prevent further CSF leakage.[12] Furthermore, intraoperative anesthesiological procedures such as increasing positive-pressure ventilation over the short-term further allow control of proper watertight sealing.[16]

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of IH is critical. If inserted too deeply, a contralateral needle placed in a unilateral spinal decompression is advised, as it might compensate for IH development through the tamponade effect afforded by the posterior spinal canal. In the case of CSF leakage, proper intraoperative surgical and anesthesiological measures are crucial, even if leakage is in the sub-millimeter range.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Surgery versus conservative care for persistent sciatica lasting 4 to 12 months. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1093-102.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak as the cause of chronic subdural hematomas in nongeriatric patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:1380-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Diskogenic microspurs as a major cause of intractable spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology. 2016;87:1220-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Cerebrospinal fluid leaks following spinal surgery: Use of fat grafts for prevention and repair. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:250-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Early epidural blood patch to treat intracranial hypotension after iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leakage from lumbar tubular microdiscectomy. Cureus. 2018;10:e3633.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Intracranial spontaneous hypotension associated with CSF cervical leakage successfully treated by lumbar epidural blood patch. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152:1997-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Strategies to avoid wrong-site surgery during spinal procedures. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31:E5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Effect of fibrin glue on the prevention of persistent cerebral spinal fluid leakage after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1169-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Subdural hematoma as a late complication of spinal anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15:47-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Duraseal exact is a safe adjunctive treatment for durotomy in spine: Postapproval study. Global Spine J. 2019;9:272-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Does preservation of ligamentum flavum in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interlaminar discectomy improve clinical outcomes? Neurospine. 2019;16:113-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Microsurgical anatomy and treatment of dural defects in spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;13:1-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Analysis of the techniques for thoracic-and lumbar-level localization during posterior spine surgery and the occurrence of wrong-level surgery: Results from a national survey. Spine J. 2014;14:741-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . The prevalence of wrong level surgery among spine surgeons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:194-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . The influence of mechanic factors in disc degeneration disease as a determinant for surgical indication. Neurospine. 2020;17:215-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Effects of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressure in pediatric neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2013;25:330-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Primary closure of inadvertent durotomies utilizing the U-Clip in minimally invasive spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E1753-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Direct visualization of the dural puncture site during Lumbar spine surgery performed under spinal anesthesia: A case report. A A Pract 2021. ;. ;15:e01397.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . The impact of spinal needle selection on postdural puncture headache: A meta-analysis and metaregression of randomized studies. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:502-8.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections