View/Download PDF
Case Report
2019
:10;
223
doi:
10.25259/SNI_374_2019
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Clinical and surgical management of holocervical spinal cord ependymomas

Departments of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles.
Departments of Anesthesiology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Corresponding author: Luke Macyszyn, M.D., M.A., 200 UCLA Medical Plaza B265, Los Angeles, CA 90095. lmacyszyn@mednet.ucla.edu
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Mckay K, Attiah M, Niu T, Nagasawa D, Patel K, Gaonkar B, et al. Clinical and surgical management of holocervical spinal cord ependymomas. Surg Neurol Int 2019;10:223.

Abstract

Background:

Spinal ependymomas are rare tumors of the central nervous system, and those spanning the entire cervical spine are atypical. Here, we present two unusual cases of holocervical (C1-C7) spinal ependymomas.

Case Description:

Two patients, a 32-year-old female and a 24-year-old male presented with neck pain, motor, and sensory deficits. Sagittal MRI confirmed hypointense lesions on T1 and hyperintense regions on T2 spanning the entire cervical spine. These were accompanied by cystic cavities extending caudally into the thoracic spine and rostrally to the cervicomedullary junction. Both patients underwent gross total resection of these lesions and sustained excellent recoveries.

Conclusion:

Two holocervical cord intramedullary ependymomas were safely and effectively surgically resected without incurring significant perioperative morbidity.

Keywords

Ependymoma
Spinal cord tumor
Tumor cyst

INTRODUCTION

Ependymomas are exceptionally rare primary intramedullary gliomas of the central nervous system.[3,5] Complete surgical resection of holocervical intramedullary lesions (spanning C1-C7) is optimal.[2] Here, we present two cases of gross total en-bloc resection of holocervical cord intramedullary ependymomas, extending from the cervicomedullary junction to the thoracic spine.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Patient 1

A 32-year-old female presented with severe progressive spastic quadriparesis attributed to a cervical cord intramedullary tumor (e.g., large cystic-enhancing expansile mass) extending from C1 to C7-T1 on MRI [Figure 1]. She underwent a C1-T1 laminectomy for en-bloc tumor removal with a C2-C7 laminoplasty. Pathology deemed it a WHO grade II spinal ependymoma. Intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) did not change. Postoperatively, her neurological examination did not deteriorate. Sixteen months later, the patient’s gait ataxia and motor deficits resolved; the only residual deficit was proprioceptive loss in the right upper extremity. The 15-month postoperative MRI confirmed no evidence of residual or recurrent tumor [Figure 2].

Figure 1:: Case 1. Preoperative MRI cervical spine T1-weighted with contrast (left) and T2 weighted (right). There is a large-enhancing expansile mass of the cervical spinal cord extending from the level C1-C7 measuring 9.8 × 1.2 cm. A large tumor cyst extends from end of mass at C7 inferiorly into the thoracic spine.
Figure 2:: Case 1. Postoperative sagittal T1-weighted with contrast (left) and T2-weighted (right) MR images of the cervical spine after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Gross total resection was achieved with no residual tumor.

Patient 2

A 24-year-old male also presented with a spastic quadriparesis and cervical MR-documented cystic, enhancing, expansile intramedullary mass extending from C1-C7 [Figure 3].

Figure 3:: Case 2. Preoperative sagittal T1-weighted with contrast (left) and T2-weighted (right) MR images demonstrating a heterogeneous mass within the cervical cord from C1-C7. The superior portion of the mass demonstrates 1.7 × 3.6 cm cystic component.

A C1-C7 laminectomy with midline myelotomy (en bloc tumor removal) and C2-C7 posterior fusion was performed. MEP’s remained unchanged during the surgery. Postoperatively, the patient showed no neurological worsening. Pathologically, this was deemed a WHO grade II ependymoma. One year later, the patient had 4+/5 motor strength in the upper extremities, intact motor strength in his lower extremities, and mild residual decreased sensation in the right C6-C7 dermatome. The 1-year postoperative cervical MRI showed no evidence of residual or recurrent tumor [Figure 4].

Figure 4:: Case 2. Postoperative sagittal T1-weighted with contrast (left) and T2-weighted (right) MR images after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Gross total resection was achieved, albeit with marked spinal cord myelomalacia from C2-C3 through C6.

DISCUSSION

Demographics

Ependymomas tend to present more often in middle-aged adults and in the spinal cord.[1,4]

Clinical presentation

Patients commonly experience symptoms for over a year before their initial diagnosis.[1] Common symptoms can include pain, sensory and motor deficits, gait ataxia, bladder, and bowel dysfunction.[5]

MR findings

MR imaging of spinal ependymomas demonstrates hypo- to isointensity on T1, hyperintense on T2 studies, often with a cystic component, and heterogenous enhancement with gadolinium.[1]

Surgical considerations and intraoperative monitoring

Both cases were performed with patient in the prone position. MEP and SSEP were used throughout. Both patients had wide laminectomies performed for adequate visualization. Following central durotomies, the spinal cords of both patients were significantly expanded. Midline myelotomies were performed in the both cases under microscopic visualization and were carried superiorly and inferiorly to the poles of the tumor. Both tumors were resected en bloc. We have found that if a favorable plane is delineated between tumor and normal tissue, internal debulking may add unnecessary time and undue cord manipulation potentially. Frequently in our practice, there is an associated cyst at the superior and inferior poles of the tumor. Care must be taken when resecting the poles of the tumors when next to a cystic cavity, as this may cause the surgeon to lose orientation, leading to inadvertent cord manipulation. At the end of the dissection/tumor removal, the arachnoid was approximated in both patients with 6-0 proline sutures, a maneuver performed to reduce pathologic traction, prevent adhesions, and reconstitute a more anatomic central canal. The extent of bony removal increases the potential for postoperative kyphosis. The risk of deformity can be mitigated by concurrently providing rigid or semirigid internal fixation, e.g., augmenting the decompression with laminoplasty or posterior lateral mass fusion.

CONCLUSION

Two patients underwent en bloc surgical resection of holocervical cord C1-C7 intramedullary WHO grade II ependymomas. Our patients had excellent recovery of neurological function up to and including their respective most recent follow-up visits at 28 and 12 months postoperatively.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , , . Surgical outcomes of spinal cord and cauda equina ependymoma: Postoperative motor status and recurrence for each WHO grade in a multicenter study. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23:614-21
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . MRI characteristics of spinal ependymoma in WHO grade II: A review of 59 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E525-30
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Surgical technique and outcomes in the treatment of spinal cord ependymomas, part 1: Intramedullary ependymomas. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:57-63
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Surgical treatment of spinal ependymomas: Experience in 49 patients. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e703-9
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Spinal ependymoma in adults: A multicenter investigation of surgical outcome and progression-free survival. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28:654-62
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections