Cervical intramedullary solitary fibrous tumor: Case report and review of the literature

Ruben Rodríguez-Mena; José Piquer-Belloch; Jose Luis Llácer-Ortega; Pedro Riesgo-Suárez; Vicente Rovira-Lillo; Alain Flor-Goikoetxea-Gamo; Antonio Cremades-Mira; Raúl Mut-Pons

doi:10.25259/SNI_698_2020

View/Download PDF

Case Report

2020

:11;

468

doi:

10.25259/SNI_698_2020

Buy Reprints

PDF

Cervical intramedullary solitary fibrous tumor: Case report and review of the literature

Ruben Rodríguez-Mena¹, José Piquer-Belloch¹, Jose Luis Llácer-Ortega¹, Pedro Riesgo-Suárez¹, Vicente Rovira-Lillo¹, Alain Flor-Goikoetxea-Gamo¹, Antonio Cremades-Mira², Raúl Mut-Pons³

1Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Cátedra de Neurociencias - Fundación Vithas – CEU, Spain.

2Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Carretera de Corbera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.

3Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Carretera de Corbera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.

*Corresponding author: Ruben Rodríguez-Mena, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, Cátedra de Neurociencias - Fundación Vithas – CEU, Carretera de Corbera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain. rodriguez_rubmen@gva.es

Received: 2020-10-03, Accepted: 2020-11-09, Published: 2020-12-29

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Rodríguez-Mena R, Piquer-Belloch J, Llácer-Ortega JL, Riesgo-Suárez P, Rovira-Lillo V, Gamo AF, et al. Cervical intramedullary solitary fibrous tumor – A case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2020;11:468.

Abstract

Background:

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are benign tumors derived from mesenchymal tissues that predominantly occur in the pleura. Establishing the diagnosis of these very rare intramedullary spinal lesions, with no clear-cut pathognomonic radiographic characteristics, is particularly challenging.

Case Description:

Two males, 30 and 41 years of age, presented with progressive cervical myelopathies attributed to a cervical intramedullary exophytic tumor with associated spinal cord edema. One patient showed that the lesion was highly vascularized. Both patients underwent surgical excision of firm, solid, focal, and, particularly in one of them, very vascular/hemorrhagic tumors; at surgery, there was some adherence between the tumors and the cord tissue, but gross-total resections were achieved in both cases, demonstrated on postoperative MR scans. Histological and immunohistochemical findings confirmed the diagnosis of SFT (WHO Grade I). After a 6-month postoperative period, both patients neurologically improved and had no MR evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion:

Intramedullary cervical exophytic SFTs are extremely rare. Although these solid tumors may present with hemorrhagic features and at surgery demonstrate significant adherence to the pial/cord surface, complete surgical resections are feasible resulting in good outcomes.

Keywords

Cervical

Intramedullary

Solitary fibrous tumor

Surgery

Vascularized

Show Related Articles from PubMed

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary cervical solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are extremely rare. Their low rate of presentation within the spinal cord itself makes the preoperative radiologic diagnosis and surgical planning, particularly challenging.[3-8] Gross-total surgical removal should be attempted to minimize the risk of tumor recurrence and improve patients’ quality of life.[1,4] Here, we present two cases of cervical intramedullary SFTs that were completely removed with good clinical outcomes.

CASE REPORT # 1

A 30-year-old male presented a 3-month history of neck pain and a progressive cervical myelopathy. The MR showed an intramedullary exophytic well-circumscribed C2-C3 mass with associated spinal cord edema inferior to the lesion. The tumor was isointense on T1-weighted image (T1WI), hyperintense on T2-weighted image (T2WI), and showed homogeneous gadolinium contrast enhancement. Digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) showed rich tumor vascularization with feeding branches from both of the vertebral arteries, including a right lateral spinal artery descending from the right posteroinferior cerebellar artery (PICA) [Figure 1a-e]. At surgery, the intramedullary tumor was solid/firm and hemorrhagic; it also demonstrated an exophytic component. Despite partial adherence to the cord, it was freed from the pia, allowing for piecemeal gross-total resection (GTR). The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful. The immediate postoperative MR confirmed GTR [Figure 1f-g]. After 6 months, he fully recovered neurologically, and at 2 years postoperatively, the MR demonstrated no tumor recurrence.

Histology

The histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a SFT. It revealed uniform spindle cells surrounded by moderate fibrous stroma with intermingled collagenous fibers and a few well-demarcated branched blood vessels (“staghorn” vasculature). The overall cell population barely had discrete cytological atypia and mitotic activity, and there was no evidence of necrosis. On immunohistochemistry, the neoplasm was diffusely and strongly positive for BcL-2, CD34, and CD99 and negative for S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). The Ki-67 proliferation index was 1%, and the conclusive diagnosis of a SFT with no malignant features (WHO Grade I) was made.

CASE REPORT # 2

A 41-year-old male presented with a 2-month history of a slowly progressive cervical myelopathy. The MR demonstrated an intramedullary exophytic tumor at C5-C7. The lesion was isointense on T1WI, heterogeneous on T2WI (predominantly hypointense with alternating smaller hyperintense areas), and homogeneously enhanced with contrast [Figure 2a-c]. At surgery, this intramedullary lesion had exophytic components. Despite a thin attachment to the pia mater at the anterior left side of the mass and to the ipsilateral C6 exiting nerve root, a GTR was achieved. This was confirmed on the immediate postoperative MR [Figure 2d-e]. He was neurologically normal 7 months postoperatively, and no tumor regrowth was seen on the MR 3 years later.

Histology

The pathological analysis was consistent with an SFT. It showed uniform small, basophilic, ovoid to spindled cells with oval nuclei, and ill-defined cytoplasm, with numerous thin-walled ramifying blood vessels in certain areas. Necrosis and mitosis were not evident. Immunohistochemical staining indicated strong positivity for CD34 and Bcl-2 (C). The Ki-67 proliferation index was less than 1%. The final diagnosis of a SFT with no malignant features (WHO Grade I) was then established [Figure 3].

DISCUSSION

Inside the CNS, spinal cord occurrence of SFT is exceedingly uncommon; there have been 22 cases reported [Table 1].

SFT occurs predominantly in middle-aged patients, with a modest male preponderance.[1] Clinical findings include localized pain and neurological deficits reflecting the level of intramedullary involvement. Since the majority of the SFT are considered benign, symptoms are attributed to their mass effect which can be best relieved with gross-total excision.

Radiographic findings

On MR, SFTs can be seen as a single, oval or irregular heterogeneous mass, sometimes having well-circumscribed margins, and tend to appear isointense on T1WI and hypointense on T2WI.[7,10] They markedly enhance with contrast (homogeneous or heterogeneous). Therefore, detailed examination and recognition of feeding branches (e.g., from vertebral arteries and PICA on the cervical region) on MRI, but specifically on DSA, are strongly recommended.

Histopathology

Histopathologically, SFT cells are encircled by dense collagen networks in fascicular, storiform, herringbone, or patternless arrangements on hematoxylin and eosin staining.[7] On immunohistochemistry, positivity for CD34, CD 99, vimentin, and BcL-2 and negativity for EMA, smooth-muscle actin, and S-100 are distinguishing features of SFT.[7,8]

Gross-total excision

Gross-total removal is the recommended treatment of spinal SFT (under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring) [3-5,7] Here, we presented two well-circumscribed, firm, highly vascularized cervical SFT with strong adhesions to the spinal cord tissues, accompanied by exophytic components. These lesions may exhibit numerous feeding vessels from both vertebral arteries most readily diagnosed with DSA. In spite of their benign histology, and a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%, recurrence (e.g., up to 2–14 years) has been noted with incomplete tumor resections.[1-3,8,9]

CONCLUSION

Here, we described two cases of intramedullary cervical exophytic SFTs that were completely excised and have not yet recurred, 2 and 3 years postoperatively.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

Albert GW, Gokden M. Solitary fibrous tumors of the spine: A pediatric case report with a comprehensive review of the literature. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;19:339-48.
[Google Scholar]
Bisceglia M, Dimitri L, Giannatempo G, Carotenuto V, Bianco M, Monte V, . Solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system: Report of an additional 5 cases with comprehensive literature review. Int J Surg Pathol. 2011;19:476-86.
[Google Scholar]
Bohinski RJ, Mendel E, Aldape KD, Rhines LD. Intramedullary and extramedullary solitary fibrous tumor of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;100:358-63.
[Google Scholar]
Bruder M, Tews D, Mittelbronn M, Capper D, Seifert V, Marquardt G. Intramedullary solitary fibrous tumor--a benign form of hemangiopericytoma? Case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:189.e7-12.
[Google Scholar]
Ciappetta P, D’Urso PI, Cimmino A, Ingravallo G, Rossi R, Colamaria A, . Intramedullary solitary fibrous tumor of dorsal spinal cord. Neuropathology. 2009;30:273-8.
[Google Scholar]
Glauser G, Sharma N, Kritikos M, Malhotra NR, Choudhri O. Cervical, intradural extramedullary solitary fibrous tumor of the spinal cord: A case report and review of the literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020;15:204-9.
[Google Scholar]
Jallo GI, Roonprapunt C, Kothbauer K, Freed D, Allen J, Epstein F. Spinal solitary fibrous tumors: A series of four patients: Case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E195.
[Google Scholar]
Tihan T, Viglione M, Rosenblum MK, Olivi A, Burger PC. Solitary fibrous tumors in the central nervous system. A clinicopathologic review of 18 cases and comparison to meningeal hemangiopericytomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:432-9.
[Google Scholar]
Wang J, Zhao K, Han L, Jiao L, Liu W, Xu Y, . Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of spinal cord: A retrospective single-center study of 16 cases. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e629-38.
[Google Scholar]
Yi X, Xiao D, He Y, Yin H, Gong G, Long X, . Spinal solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma: A clinicopathologic and radiologic analysis of eleven cases. World Neurosurg. 2017;104:318-29.
[Google Scholar]