Translate this page into:
Arteriovenous malformation presenting as traumatic subdural hematoma: A case report
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
How to cite this article: Parr M, Patel N, Kauffmann J, Al-Mufti F, Roychowdhury S, Narayan V, et al. Arteriovenous malformation presenting as traumatic subdural hematoma: A case report. Surg Neurol Int 2020;11:203.
Abstract
Background:
Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are congenital aberrant connections between afferent arteries and draining veins with no intervening capillary bed or neural parenchyma. Other than seizures, the most common initial presentation of AVM is hemorrhage, which is typically intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, or intraventricular, and very rarely subdural.
Case Description:
This patient is a 66-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronically anticoagulated with apixaban, who presented through emergency services after a fall. On presentation, computed tomography (CT) of the head showed a small, 6 mm right subdural hematoma, and the patient was neurologically intact. The hematoma was evacuated by burr hole craniotomy and placement of a subdural drain 12 days after the initial presentation due to worsening headaches and further hematoma expansion. Two weeks postevacuation, the patient was readmitted for seizures, and at this time, CT angiography showed no intracranial vascular lesion. Approximately 1 month later, the patient was readmitted for decreased responsiveness, and CT head at this time found right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage. On subsequent catheter angiography, the right frontal AVM was discovered. It was treated with preoperative embolization followed by surgical resection. Postoperatively, the patient followed commands and tracked with his eyes. There was spontaneous antigravity movement of the right upper extremity, but still no movement of the left upper or bilateral lower extremities.
Conclusion:
This case emphasizes the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for underlying vascular lesions when evaluating intracranial bleeding, even in the setting of traumatic history, particularly in cases of hematoma expansion.
Keywords
Arteriovenous malformation
Intracranial hemorrhage
Subdural hematoma
INTRODUCTION
Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are congenital aberrant connections between afferent arteries and draining veins with no intervening capillary bed or neural parenchyma. These are distinct from other cerebral vascular anomalies such as cavernous malformations and dural AV fistulas.[4] In contrast to AVMs, cavernous malformations contain thin-walled vascular channels without intervening brain tissue, but are often angiographically occult as they are low pressure systems that typically do not shunt blood; additionally, AV fistulas are distinct as they arise from within the leaflets of the dura mater.[3,22]
The most common initial symptomatic presentation of AVM is hemorrhage, which is typically intraparenchymal, subarachnoid, or intraventricular, but less frequently can be subdural.[10] Other common presentations may be with seizure or headache.[1] They may also be found incidentally in patients who are completely asymptomatic. AVMs are often diagnosed through angiographic studies (computed tomography [CT] angiography, magnetic resonance [MR] angiography, or conventional catheter angiography) though in cases of hemorrhage, the mass effect of the bleed may obscure the AVM certain types of studies, such as CT angiography (CTA), which may lead to misdiagnosis in the acute setting.[16] Angiography is also utilized to grade the surgical risk of resection, often through the Spetzler-Martin grading scale, which rates the lesion on a scale of 1-5, with increasing risk of surgical complications from resection, based on the size, venous drainage, and eloquence of the region of the brain in which the AVM is located.[18] The new Spetzler-Ponce grading system simplifies this 5 grade system to a 3 grade system, in which the recommended management for Grade A is surgical, Grade B is multimodal, and Grade C is observation.[19]
In the following case, we present a patient in whom the diagnosis of AVM was missed on initial presentation for subdural hematoma (SDH), which was believed to be secondary to a traumatic etiology. The AVM was later diagnosed by catheter angiography after rupture and intraparenchymal bleed.
CASE REPORT
This is a 66-year-old male with a medical history significant for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis C virus infection, and atrial fibrillation chronically anticoagulated with apixaban. He was brought in by emergency services after a fall. The patient reported dizziness, then lost consciousness, and was found down by a family member. Primary trauma survey was negative with a Glasgow Coma Score of 15 no focal neurological deficits. Noncontrast CT of the head [Figure 1a] was significant for a 6 mm right frontal SDH with no shift, as well as a right medial orbital wall fracture. As the patient was neurologically intact, had minimal mass effect, there was no operative intervention recommended.

The patient was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for serial checks. On the 2nd hospital day, he developed severe headache, and the head CT was repeated [Figure 1b], which showed worsening of the SDH with associated mass effect and 2 mm midline shift. The patient remained neurologically intact; therefore, no surgical intervention was recommended. The patient was discharged to acute inpatient rehabilitation on the 6th hospital day with instructions to repeat the head CT in 2 weeks.
In rehabilitation, 6 days after discharge, the patient experienced a terrible headache for 3 days, which prompted a repeat neurosurgical evaluation. The patient was still neurologically intact at this time, and repeat CT head [Figure 2a] showed expansion of the hematoma to 15 mm, with increased mass effect and 8 mm midline shift. The patient underwent burr holes for evacuation of the SDH and placement of subdural drain. Following hematoma evacuation, the patient’s headache improved, and the SDH decreased in size on repeat CT head [Figure 2b]. His postoperative course was without complication. The drain was removed and the patient was discharged home on the 2nd postoperative day with levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis.

On the 14th postoperative day, the patient was seen in the office for follow-up. The patient described a strange sensation in the right arm, as well as the feeling that he could not control the arm. Based on these symptoms, he was sent directly to the emergency room for further evaluation. In the emergency room, the patient developed a focal left arm seizure. He was treated for this seizure and started on electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. He was then admitted. That night, the patient was found to be unresponsive; CT head showed no acute hemorrhage and EEG indicated status epilepticus. The patient was intubated for airway protection and transferred to the medical intensive care unit for further management.
As the patient’s initial presentation was hemorrhagic but thought to be traumatic, dedicated vascular imaging had not been obtained previously. During this third admission, cerebral CTA was obtained as his clinical course became suspicious for either an underlying lesion or vascular issue. The studies were negative for any pathology. This admission was complicated by ventilator-dependent respiratory failure, septic shock secondary to Pseudomonas bacteremia, and the patient received a tracheostomy and gastrostomy. The patient was eventually stabilized and discharged to long-term acute care hospital on day 29 with levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine for seizure control.
Four days after discharge, the patient was found to be less responsive and was transferred back for neurosurgical evaluation. The patient opened eyes to stimulation, localized with the right upper extremity, and had minimal movement of left upper and bilateral lower extremities, and cough, gag, corneal, and pupillary reflexes were all present. CT and CTA head [Figure 3] showed right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage measuring 5.2 cm×3.3 cm but no vascular lesion or anomaly. Cerebral catheter angiography was then performed and [Figure 4a and b] showed prominence of the anterior temporal branch of the right middle cerebral artery with early, rapid, shunting of blood through a cortical vein to the superior sagittal sinus. There was opacification of a capillary-like serpiginous tangle of vessels connecting the anterior temporal artery with the early draining vein, representing an AVM, which was Spetzler-Martin Grade 1 (Spetzler-Ponce Grade A). On the second postangiogram day, embolization of the AVM was performed using N-butyl- cyanoacrylate glue. The embolization was successful and no opacification of the early draining vein or AVM nidus were seen [Figure 4c and d].


On the 8th day postembolization, the patient was taken to the operating room for resection of the AVM. The right pterional craniotomy was performed to access the AVM, which was separated from surrounding brain parenchyma using microdissection techniques. The feeding arteries, followed by the draining vein, were coagulated using bipolar electrocautery and resected. Following resection, intraoperative Doppler ultrasound indicated no arterial flow in the draining vein. The associated intraparenchymal hematoma was also evacuated. Postoperative angiography showed no residual AVM.
Postoperatively, the patient’s mental status progressively improved. On the 3rd postoperative day, the patient followed commands and tracked with his eyes. There was spontaneous antigravity movement of the right upper extremity, but still no movement of the left upper or bilateral lower extremities. The postoperative course was complicated by pseudomonas sepsis, which was treated in consultation with infectious disease. The patient was eventually discharged to long-term acute care on the 15th postoperative day.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we present a case of an AVM, which ruptured, leading to intraparenchymal hemorrhage. This patient’s. initial presentation was 2 months before the rupture, when he was brought to the ED with a SDH after falling from standing, while systemically anticoagulated. Due to the traumatic etiology of presentation, angiographic studies were not conducted at this time, and the AVM was not recognized. The SDH eventually required evacuation, which was uneventful, and again did not reveal the AVM. The patient subsequently was readmitted for seizures. CTA at this time did not reveal the AVM. Approximately 1 month later, at the time that the AVM ruptured and the patient suffered intraparenchymal hemorrhage, the AVM was diagnosed by catheter angiography. The AVM was subsequently treated by staged endovascular embolization and open surgical resection. This case showed that what might appear as a simple traumatic hematoma may in fact be a more subtle pathology. Further, when a known hematoma continues to expand without any other cause, or a SDH is identified without a traumatic etiology, a vascular lesion should be considered in the differential.
AVMs are aberrant connections between afferent arteries and draining veins with no intervening capillary bed.[4] The incidence of brain AVM is 1.12–1.42/100,000 person- years.[2,7,12,20] Symptomatic AVMs commonly present with hemorrhage (50%), seizure (30%), or headache (5–14%).[1]
Overall, the risk of spontaneous hemorrhage of an AVM is 2–4% per year, amounting to approximately 78% lifetime risk in the instance, for example, of an annual risk of 3% and a remaining life expectancy of 50 years, but this number is dependent on the remaining life expectancy of the patient.[6,8,13] The risk for any particular patient is also dependent on several characteristics of the AVM. Factors that are reported to increase the risk for spontaneous hemorrhage include prior rupture/hemorrhage, deep venous drainage, deep and infratentorial location of AVM nidus, and concurrent aneurysm.[1,6,21] A small nidus has a higher rate of hemorrhage at initial presentation, while a large nidus has a higher rate of future hemorrhage.[9-11] The most common locations of hemorrhage are intraparenchymal, intraventricular, and subarachnoid, with subdural hemorrhage much less likely.[10] The operative management options include open microsurgery, endovascular embolization, and radiosurgery. Among all patient with AVM, mortality rates have been shown to be improved with intervention, though the ARUBA trial demonstrated increased rates of composite stroke and mortality for intervention on patients with unruptured AVM compared to medical management.[14,15]
In the instance of the patient discussed above, it is unknown whether the initial SDH was caused by rupture of the AVM, as the hematoma was overlying the AVM, but occurred in the setting of trauma with systemic anticoagulation. In a traumatic presentation of SDH, it is not typical to utilize angiographic imaging. In a study of 600 traumatic brain injury patients, Naraghi et al. found that 132 (22%) underwent CTA, but management was only changed in one patient after CTA, who then underwent catheter angiography, which ended up being negative. They concluded that CTA is not necessary in the initial evaluation of most trauma patients.[17] However, when the history of the injury and the findings on imaging and examination of the patient are incongruent, or when there is no history of trauma in the case of a spontaneous SDH, the presence of an underlying vascular lesion should be considered. To determine which patients should be screened for blunt cerebrovascular injury due to trauma, the Denver criteria, which include specific signs and symptoms of these injuries, as well as signs of high-energy transfer that can result in vascular injury, can be used and have been shown to be independent predictors of blunt cerebrovascular injury.[5]
In this particular case, it cannot be known if the initial SDH could be referable to the later discovered AVM, or if it was simply the sequelae of trauma. Regardless, one should remain suspicious of an underlying vascular lesion when evaluating the imaging of any intracranial hemorrhage. Even if vascular imaging is not initially indicated in the setting of traumatic etiology, this suspicion should be maintained.
The patient later experienced headaches, which was attributed to expansion of the hematoma, but the AVM may have also been a contributing factor. When the patient represented with seizure, CTA was conducted, but was unable to detect the AVM at this time. While other angiographic modalities, such as CT and MR angiography, are commonly utilized as initial studies, as they are less invasive imaging options, conventional catheter angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of AVM. Earlier angiography, particularly when the patient experienced headache in the subacute phase of the initial SDH, could have resulted in earlier diagnosis of this patient’s AVM, possibly avoiding the eventual intraparenchymal hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION
Above, we discuss a case of AVM in which the diagnosis was not made on initial presentation for acute SDH secondary to what was believed to be a traumatic etiology. This AVM later ruptured leading to intraparenchymal hemorrhage. This case reinforces the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for underlying vascular lesions when evaluating intracranial bleeding, particularly in cases of hematoma expansion, even in the setting of trauma.
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E7.Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 2003;34:1163-9.Prospective, population-based detection of intracranial vascular malformations in adults: The scottish intracranial vascular malformation study (SIVMS)
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23:87-103.Acute management of ruptured arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 2001;32:1430-42.Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials.
- [Google Scholar]
- Am J Surg. 1999;178:517-22.Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 2006;37:1243-7.Clinical outcome after first and recurrent hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 2010;41:21-6.Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg Sci. 2018;62:437-43.Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: Systematic review.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg. 1983;58:331-7.Bleeding from cerebral arteriovenous malformations as part of their natural history.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 1998;29:931-4.Morbidity of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurgery. 2008;63:823-9.Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: A long-term follow-up study of risk of hemorrhage in 238 patients.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg. 2001;95:633-7.Population-based analysis of arteriovenous malformation treatment.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurgery. 1995;37:851-5.Simple risk predictions for arteriovenous malformation hemorrhage.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurgery. 2008;63:244-55.Long-term excess mortality in 623 patients with brain arteriovenous malformations.
- [Google Scholar]
- Lancet. 2014;383:614-21.Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): A multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23:27-42.Imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:1027-31.Is CT angiography of the head useful in the management of traumatic brain injury?
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg. 1986;65:476-83.A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.
- [Google Scholar]
- J Neurosurg. 2011;114:842-9.A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Clinical article.
- [Google Scholar]
- Stroke. 2003;34:e29-33.The new york islands AVM study: Design, study progress, and initial results.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurology. 2006;66:1350-5.Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformations.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29:E7.Update on the natural history of cavernous malformations and factors predicting aggressive clinical presentation.
- [Google Scholar]